Sunday, December 30, 2012

How's that gun ban in Chicago working out?

This article is about the 500 murders in Chicago where there are severe gun restrictions.

That's the most in the entire country.

In other words, you ban guns and the only people who have guns are the murdering criminals.

Will you hear the media say that?  No.

Will you hear a politician say that?  No.

Will they pass a gun ban?  Yes.

Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Passenger Words Performance

Passenger 'I Hate' Live from The Borderline, London (Short Version)

Here's a Canadian politician that understands the real fiscal cliff the U.S. is heading off

Does it surprise anyone that Obama's daughters go to a school where 11 armed guards plus Secret Service protect the kids?

This is the double standard that enrages most thinking Americans.

Here's a link to the article that talks about the fortress where Obama's daughters attend school with 11 armed guards plus Secret Service

Knowing this, Obama and other politicians like him got up in their Ivory Towers, and talked down to us dumbasses to be sure we know how to think.

Here is our Ruler dabbing the fake tears out of his eyes while basically saying he's going to take away your Rights after he gets back from his vacation:

Is it not upsetting to know, he's putting on this act while knowing full-well his daughters are going to school where a lunatic shooter wouldn't even be able to make into the driveway of the parking lot?

In other words, these guys are fully aware of what it takes to be sure kids are safe.  They know guns in the hands of sane and brave adults are the only true defense.

However, if anyone's watching the robots in the media hyping this insanity, who are based in Washington and who also send their kids to the same school, you can just feel what's going to happen here in the next couple of weeks.  Democrats and Republicans are going to put on a show for the peasants that will look like a debate, but it's already a foregone conclusion that they are coming for the guns.

They will pass gun control legislation, not because they give a shit about your children because, if they did actually care, they would end the wars, they would stop putting trillions on the national debt, and they would send your children to schools like the ones where they send their own.

But you see, they're special, and you're the dumbass peasant, and you are meant to feel like you are living on big daddy's plantation.

The real reason they are coming for guns has nothing to do with the reason they say they are because they are murdering children everyday with drone strikes all over the world.

The reason they want to take guns is the same reason Hitler disarmed, which is, they don't want you to be able to retaliate once you figure out just how badly the system they created is fucking everyone over while enriching the "special one's" with enough money to send their kids to safe schools.

They know what's really going on.  They know a storm is brewing.

They know the Fed's O% interest rate policy is going to cause hyper-inflation, which will eventually cause food riots, and people will flood the streets, and it will eventually lead to a new World War.

And as I'm re-reading all this crap that I've written, I'm thinking, I would be better off, if I didn't even bother to see all this crap that I'm seeing.

Tuesday, December 25, 2012

Kyle Bass gives a great speech regarding the state of economic affairs

They turned off embedding, but here's the link.

Monday, December 24, 2012

A Message From Ron Paul "Government Security Is Just Another Kind Of Violence"

From Ron Paul
Government Security Is Just Another Kind Of Violence
The senseless and horrific killings last week in Newtown, Connecticut reminded us that a determined individual or group of individuals can cause great harm no matter what laws are in place.  Connecticut already has restrictive gun laws relative to other states, including restrictions on fully automatic, so-called “assault” rifles and gun-free zones. 
Predictably, the political left responded to the tragedy with emotional calls for increased gun control.  This is understandable, but misguided. The impulse to have government “do something” to protect us in the wake national tragedies is reflexive and often well intentioned.  Many Americans believe that if we simply pass the right laws, future horrors like the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting can be prevented.  But this impulse ignores the self evident truth that criminals don't obey laws.   
The political right, unfortunately, has fallen into the same trap in its calls for quick legislative solutions to gun violence.  If only we put armed police or armed teachers in schools, we’re told, would-be school shooters will be dissuaded or stopped. 
While I certainly agree that more guns equals less crime and that private gun ownership prevents many shootings, I don’t agree that conservatives and libertarians should view government legislation, especially at the federal level, as the solution to violence.  Real change can happen only when we commit ourselves to rebuilding civil society in America, meaning a society based on family, religion, civic and social institutions, and peaceful cooperation through markets.  We cannot reverse decades of moral and intellectual decline by snapping our fingers and passing laws. 
Let’s not forget that our own government policies often undermine civil society, cheapen life, and encourage immorality.  The president and other government officials denounce school violence, yet still advocate for endless undeclared wars abroad and easy abortion at home.  U.S. drone strikes kill thousands, but nobody in America holds vigils or devotes much news coverage to those victims, many of which are children, albeit, of a different color.
Obviously I don’t want to conflate complex issues of foreign policy and war with the Sandy Hook shooting, but it is important to make the broader point that our federal government has zero moral authority to legislate against violence.
Furthermore, do we really want to live in a world of police checkpoints, surveillance cameras, metal detectors, X-ray scanners, and warrantless physical searches?  We see this culture in our airports: witness the shabby spectacle of once proud, happy Americans shuffling through long lines while uniformed TSA agents bark orders.  This is the world of government provided "security," a world far too many Americans now seem to accept or even endorse.  School shootings, no matter how horrific, do not justify creating an Orwellian surveillance state in America.
Do we really believe government can provide total security?  Do we want to involuntarily commit every disaffected, disturbed, or alienated person who fantasizes about violence?  Or can we accept that liberty is more important than the illusion of state-provided security? Government cannot create a world without risks, nor would we really wish to live in such a fictional place.  Only a totalitarian society would even claim absolute safety as a worthy ideal, because it would require total state control over its citizens’ lives.  We shouldn’t settle for substituting one type of violence for another. Government role is to protect liberty, not to pursue unobtainable safety.
Our freedoms as Americans preceded gun control laws, the TSA, or the Department of Homeland Security.  Freedom is defined by the ability of citizens to live without government interference, not by safety. It is easy to clamor for government security when terrible things happen; but liberty is given true meaning when we support it without exception, and we will be safer for it.

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

The Secret Lives of L. Ron Hubbard

This is a great documentary where Hubbard's lies are exposed.

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Max Keiser: Colossal Collapse Coming!

Max has a knack for spotting corruption in the complex world of finance and breaking it down for the layperson to easily understand.

Monday, December 17, 2012

Matt Taibbi is at it again

Definitely should read this.

If this doesn't get you riled, nothing will.

Sunday, December 16, 2012

This video shows how media coverage propagates mass shootings

Roger Ebert talking sense of these

Let me tell you a story. The day after Columbine, I was interviewed for the Tom Brokaw news program. The reporter had been assigned a theory and was seeking sound bites to support it. "Wouldn't you say," she asked, "that killings like this are influenced by violent movies?" No, I said, I wouldn't say that. "But what about 'Basketball Diaries'?" she asked. "Doesn't that have a scene of a boy walking into a school with a machine gun?" The obscure 1995 Leonardo Di Caprio movie did indeed have a brief fantasy scene of that nature, I said, but the movie failed at the box office (it grossed only $2.5 million), and it's unlikely the Columbine killers saw it.
The reporter looked disappointed, so I offered her my theory. "Events like this," I said, "if they are influenced by anything, are influenced by news programs like your own. When an unbalanced kid walks into a school and starts shooting, it becomes a major media event. Cable news drops ordinary programming and goes around the clock with it. The story is assigned a logo and a theme song; these two kids were packaged as the Trench Coat Mafia. The message is clear to other disturbed kids around the country: If I shoot up my school, I can be famous. The TV will talk about nothing else but me. Experts will try to figure out what I was thinking. The kids and teachers at school will see they shouldn't have messed with me. I'll go out in a blaze of glory."
In short, I said, events like Columbine are influenced far less by violent movies than by CNN, the NBC Nightly News and all the other news media, who glorify the killers in the guise of "explaining" them. I commended the policy at the Sun-Times, where our editor said the paper would no longer feature school killings on Page 1. The reporter thanked me and turned off the camera. Of course the interview was never used. They found plenty of talking heads to condemn violent movies, and everybody was happy.

Friday, December 14, 2012

Speilberg's Lincoln

I went and saw that movie a few weeks ago, and I've thinking about the most important part that was left out of the movie:  The portion of 13th Amendment that makes the "exception for slavery."

Did you know the U.S. has the largest prison population of any country on the planet?

The U.S. has a larger prison population than communist China!

Did you know the reason for this has to do with the 13th Amendment?

Well you wouldn't know it, if you saw Lincoln.

The reason the U.S. has such a large prison population:  private for-profit prisons +  legalized slavery for those "duly convicted of a crime" ='s the recipe for millions of Americans behind bars for non-violent crimes.

BUT NOOOOO....Speilberg will win an Oscar for blindly glorifying Lincoln, and the part where Americans are supposed to think critically about how millions and millions of Americans are getting fucked by a system that Lincoln created gets lost because I'm living in a country full of dumbasses.

The bottom line is:  Lincoln was a fascist, who just moved slavery from the plantation to the prison system.

Thursday, December 13, 2012

Before Lisa McPherson there was Susan Meister

Another murder covered up by the cult of $cientology.  I guarantee you 99.999% of $cientologists never heard of her before.

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

This one's very interesting.

Ravi & Anoushka Shankar - Raga Anandi Kalyan

Ravi Shankar passed away yesterday.  RIP

U.S. Marine Survives Shrapnel To Ribs

You can hear dozens of bullets whizz by their heads during this intense fire fight.

Monday, December 10, 2012

On ne voit bien qu'avec le coeur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux.

It is only with the heart that one can see rightly.  What is essential is invisible to the eye.

Saturday, December 08, 2012

Max Keiser and Matt Taibbi discuss the screw job that is the world of finance

These two are my favorite commentators on the fraud in the financial world.

Friday, December 07, 2012

The Dalai Lama gives a talk "Religion and Science"

Joe Rogan and Alex Jones discuss life

I think both of these guys are pretty dialed-in, and it's definitely interesting to hear their points of view.

Thursday, December 06, 2012

Dave Brubeck "Take Five"

Jazz lost one of the very best today.  RIP

Wednesday, December 05, 2012

M83 - Midnight City (Eric Prydz Private Remix)

M249 SAW Gunner Helmet Cam Firefight

I'm going to continue posting these videos because I think it's important to be aware that our boys are still there fighting.

They are being shot at.  Some of them are still dying.

If you care, you should at the very least know that.

Monday, December 03, 2012

"Zero Dark Thirty" a piece of total propaganda garbage


Out of the more than 300-million Americans, how many people actually saw anything that confirms the death of Osama Bin Laden?

How many?

...the president and his staff?

...the navy seals?

...a few people in the Pentagon?

....and that's about it!!  Right..

My point is, this entire story can be a total fabrication because no one has really seen anything that proves the governments "official" version.


Yet, hundreds of TV douche bag talkers have told us all kinds of juicy details.

They all bragged dozens of times about how "Obama killed Osama."

And now, the film Zero Dark Thirty is supposedly going to re-enlighten everyone about all the juicy details again, and rub it in the muslims faces once again.

BUT!!  We can't see the actual footage of the raid because that would be disrespectful???????????

Are you fucking kidding me?

Doesn't this seem contradictory?  

On one hand, we can't show you!

On the other, we're going to tell you every last detail in the news, we'll brag about it again and again, and make a movie about it that shows you every last detail again and again!!


Show me the fucking footage, assholes!!

I'm not buying your horse shit until I see footage.  Whatever the president and Hillary was supposedly watching on the monitor that night...That's what I want to see.

Otherwise, I'm going to continue believing the whole thing is a hoax.

The 2016 Election: Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush will be running "against" each other in America's political farce

It's 2012, and Obama hasn't even been sworn in for his second term yet, and I'm going to predict, who will be running for president in 2016.

From what I'm already hearing Hillary Clinton will be the Democratic nominee, and Jeb Bush will be the Republican nominee.  So, America will be looking at more than 44-years Bush/Clinton American domination.

As if to say, the political system isn't completely rigged, and the controllers of the system aren't placing these 2 families into top positions of power.

It will be interesting to see, if I'm right.

Clinton/Bush will be the 2 candidates in this farce known as the U.S. political system in 2016.

Also, get ready for 4-years of a lame-duck presidency where Obama and his minions are going to be pushing for all kinds of crazy Bill of Rights violating actions to be undertaken because these political operatives have nothing to lose.

If you were watching Sunday Night Football last night and saw that idiot Bob Costas give his spiel about gun control, you saw a taste of what is about to happen to the 2nd Amendment.

Digitalism (Eric Prydz remix) "Circles"